1/10/2024 0 Comments Controlled demolition physicsI think people just can't wrap their heads around the level of internal damage, the weight of the upper undamaged floors, or the fact that 90% of the building was below the falling debris field was literally air. With 50% of the static support load gone and the weight of falling material increasing with each additionally broken floor it isn't hard to imagine that just about no object on earth could withstand that amount of weight or pressure for long. The material falling was pulling the truss supports out from the outer walls causing them to "peel" away leaving the floors below to be literally floating and only now supported by the bolts and welds in the central column. NIST, when confronted publicly with evidence produced by Chandler, finally admitted in its November 2008 Final Report that WTC 7 fell for 2. Once you look at the collapse over and over and see literally 100,000 or more tons of material rip through the floors below it at near free fall speed you could say the "banana peel" or "unzip" effect instead and it would've made more sense to people out there. Accessible introduction to the physics of building destruction, written for a lay audience sequel to Why Buildings Stand Up. In my opinion, this is no different to the other conspiracy junk put online.The thing about the WTC collapse conspiracy was the incorrectly used term the "pancake effect". So here we have unqualified people paying for their article to be published in an obscure online journal, that has zero academic credibility. The official government position holds that the collapse. Over the past 15 years many highly respected academics and experts have come forward to challenge the official narrative on the collapse of the WTC towers forwarded by the U.S. The result, this "pulbication" does not afford the authors any credibility.įurthermore, the authors, a physics professor in the field of solar energy, fusion and archeometry, a civil engineer, an aerospace engineer and the director of A&E911 truth, have precisely ZERO expertise in the relevant fields. 15 Years Later, Physics Journal Concludes: All 3 WTC Towers Collapsed Due to Controlled Demolition. Configured with Logitech G29 input bindings and manual transmission. They published them because they were paid to do so. Download Android Monza (Steering Wheel Demo) Intended for use with steering wheels. Destruction simulator: gun sandbox, bomb simulator and realistic. This very journal has been busted for plagiarism, and publishing gibberish papers (literally gibberish, zero sense made in the entire paper) in the past. Destruction physics: building demolition sandbox. Money talks, and what gets paid gets published. This unparalleled experience gives CDI clients access to a full range of services and capabilities through a global network of agents, all dedicated to the precision application of our technology. It means there is little to no peer review. CDI has felled thousands of structures on six continents, completing each project within budget and ahead of schedule. What's that you ask? It means the writers pay for publication. The journal this article was published in is an open access journal. Yeah, this journal is not especially credible from what I've read. The new study is the work of Steven Jones, former full professor of physics at Brigham Young University, Robert Korol, a professor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, Anthony Szamboti, a mechanical design engineer with over 25 years of structural design experience in the aerospace and communications industries and Ted Walter, the director of strategy and development for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a nonprofit organization that today represents more than 2,500 architects and engineers. “Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities,” the four physicists conclude in the damning report. While many in the mainstream have attempted to label anyone questioning the official narrative as “tin foil hat” conspiracy theorist, many highly respected experts have come forward to lampoon the idea that the buildings collapsed due to the intense heat and fires following two terrorist-directed plane crashes. With a controlled demolition (implosion), explosives are always used internally to a building. Anyone else read it?īut a new forensic investigation into the collapse of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11, published in Europhysics News – a highly respected European physics magazine – claims that “the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.” and interesting that that journal had published it too. Was going on about how he had been following a recent report that appeared in a peer-reviewed European journal by some respected people about 9/11 being a controlled demolition.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |